Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Not Our Brand of "Salvation" or, Monday's Service


When asked about the monetary donations she received from unsatisfactory individuals, Mother Teresa is said to have remarked that the money was cleansed by the good it would do.

During today’s service to the Salvation Army, I recalled this statement many times.

Monday’s experience was not at all what I—and I think I can speak here for the rest of the group, and say we—were expecting or what we had hoped for.  When our program leaders contacted the Salvation Army, we were told we would be doing service with the elderly and playing bingo with them.  Once we arrived to the center, though, we were redirected a given a short task to rearrange a very small food pantry, pulling the older cans to the front so they can be given out first.  After this, we were told that the individual who we were set to work with was not in, and that there was an issue with the supplies we needed to accomplish our task.  We later realized that bingo is not scheduled for Monday afternoons.

In the end, of day consisted of arranging the pantry, playing basketball among ourselves to pass the time, eating lunch, and then packaging “Salvation Army”- branded socks and their magazine publication, “War Cry,” in tissue paper to hand out to the elderly at a nursing home.

During our time at the Salvation Army, ABers picked up some the informational literature lying around.  Many of us were shocked by the obviously religious undertones, as some in the group were unfamiliar with the history and mission of the Salvation Army.  Another thing we noticed in these informational magazines was the sense that the Army saw themselves as above the people they were serving.  One article noted the story of a Roma man in Europe whose life dramatically changed after meeting a Salvationist.  The article, which was written in the first person but whose language very clearly indicated it was not written by this individual, attributed all this man’s success to the Army.  Many of us felt uncomfortable with the hierarchy present in this article and in the literature, and the overall propaganda-like feel to the information the organization was publishing.

We did get a chance to chat with one of the Salvation Army employees, who was able to give us a better sense of current efforts in Chicago to combat hunger and homelessness, as well as the demographics of those that this particular Salvation Army serves.  She stated at the largest population served is single men, but when asked if the Salvation Army captures or is interested in information on why the individuals the Army serves are homeless, she said that this area isn’t something the Salvation Army works to address.
She went on to note a program spearheaded by the city of Chicago in which, during extraordinarily cold nights, homeless individuals are picked up in vans and transported to area shelters.  She mentioned that many of the homeless refused to be transported, and went to say that many of them choose to live on the streets.  She said many of them have jobs—using family members’ addresses as their own—and are actually “wealthy” but chose to live on the streets.  She really emphasized this point: choosing to be homeless.

I was incredibly disappointed to hear that someone who works with the homeless in their community has this view.  If a person is mentally ill or unstable and, as a result, finds him- or her- self homeless, is that really a choice?  I absolutely do not think so.  Reflecting back on this conversation later in the day, I saw a connection with the Salvation Army literature I had read.  There was this overall sense of people being completely responsible for their personal plight, without regard to any of the barriers present that could lessen their ability to earn gainful employment, own a home, get an education, put food on the table, etc.

We as Alternative Break participants have come to understand homelessness (and hunger) as being linked with other issues, not the direct result of a choice or choices.  There are systems in place that make it difficult for some people to make the system work for them, and also things that mitigate their ability to improve their situation.

In the end, we came to the conclusion that although today’s experience was disappointing on two fronts: the lack of service and blame placed on homeless individuals, it was a valuable experience in terms of a true understanding of the services and systems in place in Chicago to deal with the issues we aim to address.


Maddy Bersch is a junior Government & Politics major and Arabic studies/Global terrorism/International Development & Conflict Management minor. She originally hails from Milwaukee, Wisconsin and wanted to participate in this trip to get a glimpse of efforts by the City of Chicago to combat hunger and homelessness in veteran populations.

No comments:

Post a Comment